BTW. I’m still keen to try and get everything to fit on the Nordic, because it’s just such a neat solution. I think it’s worth the struggle.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mik Lamming <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
See my previous. If I could just compile the current code then I’d have an idea how much RAM it consumes. Maybe it will fit easily. I’m working on the assumption that we may be able to dump a bunch of functionality from the DW library because we only really need the ranging. On the other hand, it looks like the ranging builds upon the basic packet handling, so there may be a limit to how much it can be chopped.
//MikOn Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:04 PM, David Carkeek <email@example.com> wrote:64k RAM seems to equate with large package. I can’t find a small physical size part with 64k RAM.
CypressAtmel 48k RAMAtmel 96k 1M FlashWhat do you think the chances are of fitting the Decawave code into 32k RAM? I think moving away from the nRF51822 will make things a lot bigger. But there might be some new/other products I haven’t found out about yet.